<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 2050 - TRIPURA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463841</link>
    <description>HC held that white and yellow petroleum jelly (IP) is a drug for external use under the Drugs &amp; Cosmetics Act and listed in Schedule K of the Rules, therefore not a mere cosmetic or petroleum sub-product. The burden lay on respondents to prove by scientific testing that it was a petroleum sub-product; mere assertion failed. Consequently the product falls under Entry 67(i) of Schedule II(a) of the TVAT Act and is taxable at 5%. The petition was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 19:36:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 2050 - TRIPURA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463841</link>
      <description>HC held that white and yellow petroleum jelly (IP) is a drug for external use under the Drugs &amp; Cosmetics Act and listed in Schedule K of the Rules, therefore not a mere cosmetic or petroleum sub-product. The burden lay on respondents to prove by scientific testing that it was a petroleum sub-product; mere assertion failed. Consequently the product falls under Entry 67(i) of Schedule II(a) of the TVAT Act and is taxable at 5%. The petition was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>