<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 2166 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463842</link>
    <description>An inclusive VAT entry for natural gas was treated as covering all variants, including regasified liquefied natural gas used as fuel in manufacture, so the rebate restriction for natural gas applied. In product classification, cough drops sold as &quot;Halls&quot; were assessed by common commercial understanding rather than licence description alone; because they were marketed and sold as candy with no medicinal value shown, they were not treated as drugs and medicines for the relevant year and fell in the residuary category. The later insertion of a specific lozenges and confectionery entry was noted as reflecting legislative intent, but it did not govern the assessment period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 19:36:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 2166 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463842</link>
      <description>An inclusive VAT entry for natural gas was treated as covering all variants, including regasified liquefied natural gas used as fuel in manufacture, so the rebate restriction for natural gas applied. In product classification, cough drops sold as &quot;Halls&quot; were assessed by common commercial understanding rather than licence description alone; because they were marketed and sold as candy with no medicinal value shown, they were not treated as drugs and medicines for the relevant year and fell in the residuary category. The later insertion of a specific lozenges and confectionery entry was noted as reflecting legislative intent, but it did not govern the assessment period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>