<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 109 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46634</link>
    <description>Pre-deposit under the appellate provision is discretionary where insisting on payment would cause undue hardship, and the authority must consider the appeal&#039;s prima facie merits, the appellant&#039;s financial position, and other relevant circumstances before deciding waiver. An order that directs deposit without addressing these material factors, or the assessee&#039;s contention that duty and interest were already paid and that the penalty issue required merits-based reconsideration, is unsustainable. The pre-deposit order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration of the waiver application after hearing both sides and deciding it on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 10:36:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 109 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46634</link>
      <description>Pre-deposit under the appellate provision is discretionary where insisting on payment would cause undue hardship, and the authority must consider the appeal&#039;s prima facie merits, the appellant&#039;s financial position, and other relevant circumstances before deciding waiver. An order that directs deposit without addressing these material factors, or the assessee&#039;s contention that duty and interest were already paid and that the penalty issue required merits-based reconsideration, is unsustainable. The pre-deposit order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration of the waiver application after hearing both sides and deciding it on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>