<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1693 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463839</link>
    <description>ITAT held that additions under s.69C for unexplained expenditure were unsustainable where the assessee had furnished audited financial statements explaining the sources. The Tribunal deleted the additions made by the AO, finding s.69C inapplicable on the facts, and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 12:15:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1693 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463839</link>
      <description>ITAT held that additions under s.69C for unexplained expenditure were unsustainable where the assessee had furnished audited financial statements explaining the sources. The Tribunal deleted the additions made by the AO, finding s.69C inapplicable on the facts, and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463839</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>