https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778591 A GST order was conditionally quashed because it did not fully deal with the petitioner's grievance on apportionment between exempted and taxable turnover and the later reply had not been considered. The Court noted that no reply was filed before the show cause stage and the post facto reply was not accepted, but still granted partial relief since the merits had not been addressed in full. Despite expiry of the appeal period, the matter was sent back for fresh consideration on merits after a fresh reply and deposit of 25% of the disputed tax. en-us Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Sep 2025 08:32:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778591 A GST order was conditionally quashed because it did not fully deal with the petitioner's grievance on apportionment between exempted and taxable turnover and the later reply had not been considered. The Court noted that no reply was filed before the show cause stage and the post facto reply was not accepted, but still granted partial relief since the merits had not been addressed in full. Despite expiry of the appeal period, the matter was sent back for fresh consideration on merits after a fresh reply and deposit of 25% of the disputed tax. Case-Laws GST Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778591