<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 118 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46616</link>
    <description>An unchallenged earlier order can preclude further appellate interference where the later decision rests on that prior order. The Tribunal had decided the matter by following its earlier order, and the Revenue had not challenged that earlier decision. On that basis, the Supreme Court declined to entertain the present appeal and found no reason to depart from the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion, with the appeal dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 09:56:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 118 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46616</link>
      <description>An unchallenged earlier order can preclude further appellate interference where the later decision rests on that prior order. The Tribunal had decided the matter by following its earlier order, and the Revenue had not challenged that earlier decision. On that basis, the Supreme Court declined to entertain the present appeal and found no reason to depart from the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion, with the appeal dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>