<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1072 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778583</link>
    <description>SC dismissed the special leave petition, affirming the High Court&#039;s conclusion that an appeal was not maintainable because the value involved fell below the pecuniary threshold fixed by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs for HC appeals. The HC had set aside confiscation and penalty, and SC held the appeal would not lie in view of the prescribed monetary limit, thereby dismissing the SLP.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 09:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1072 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778583</link>
      <description>SC dismissed the special leave petition, affirming the High Court&#039;s conclusion that an appeal was not maintainable because the value involved fell below the pecuniary threshold fixed by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs for HC appeals. The HC had set aside confiscation and penalty, and SC held the appeal would not lie in view of the prescribed monetary limit, thereby dismissing the SLP.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>