<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1069 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778580</link>
    <description>The text states that a Customs appeal was treated as not maintainable where the aggregate of redemption fine and penalty fell below the monetary threshold prescribed for appeals. It notes that the confiscation and penalty had already been set aside by the Tribunal, the High Court declined interference, and the challenge was rejected because the threshold requirement was not satisfied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 08:31:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1069 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778580</link>
      <description>The text states that a Customs appeal was treated as not maintainable where the aggregate of redemption fine and penalty fell below the monetary threshold prescribed for appeals. It notes that the confiscation and penalty had already been set aside by the Tribunal, the High Court declined interference, and the challenge was rejected because the threshold requirement was not satisfied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>