<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 117 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46614</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ applications, ruling that the petitioners are liable to pay Countervailing Duty (CVD) on the sale of plastic granules/agglomerates manufactured in their Export Processing Zone (EPZ) unit and sold in the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA). The court upheld the validity of Notification No. 48/2001-Central Excise, clarifying that exemptions do not apply to goods reprocessed in a free trade zone and brought to other parts of India. The petitioners&#039; arguments based on previous judgments and notifications were rejected, and they were unable to establish any violation of their legal or fundamental rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 09:52:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 117 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46614</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ applications, ruling that the petitioners are liable to pay Countervailing Duty (CVD) on the sale of plastic granules/agglomerates manufactured in their Export Processing Zone (EPZ) unit and sold in the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA). The court upheld the validity of Notification No. 48/2001-Central Excise, clarifying that exemptions do not apply to goods reprocessed in a free trade zone and brought to other parts of India. The petitioners&#039; arguments based on previous judgments and notifications were rejected, and they were unable to establish any violation of their legal or fundamental rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>