https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778567 HC recalled its earlier disposal and restored the writ petition after finding the petitioner had physically received the impugned order but failed to disclose this fact. The court held service under Section 169 CGST Act may be effected by prescribed modes and faulted the petitioner for alleging non-uploading while possessing a physical copy. The review was allowed on that ground, and the petitioner was granted liberty to file an appeal against the order dated 16 June 2023 before the Appellate Authority with the requisite pre-deposit by 31 October 2025. Petition disposed. en-us Wed, 10 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Sep 2025 08:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778567 HC recalled its earlier disposal and restored the writ petition after finding the petitioner had physically received the impugned order but failed to disclose this fact. The court held service under Section 169 CGST Act may be effected by prescribed modes and faulted the petitioner for alleging non-uploading while possessing a physical copy. The review was allowed on that ground, and the petitioner was granted liberty to file an appeal against the order dated 16 June 2023 before the Appellate Authority with the requisite pre-deposit by 31 October 2025. Petition disposed. Case-Laws GST Wed, 10 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778567