<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1058 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778569</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s interpretation of the exemption notification when read with the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. It found no reason to depart from the High Court&#039;s reading of the relevant tariff provisions and the surrounding regulatory framework. The interpretation adopted below was therefore confirmed, and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 08:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1058 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778569</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s interpretation of the exemption notification when read with the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. It found no reason to depart from the High Court&#039;s reading of the relevant tariff provisions and the surrounding regulatory framework. The interpretation adopted below was therefore confirmed, and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>