<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 94 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD AT LUC</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46613</link>
    <description>The Central Excise Act does not confer an unrestricted power on excise authorities to arrest or proceed as though conducting a police investigation under the Code of Criminal Procedure. Its inquiry mechanism is distinct from criminal investigation, and coercive action must remain within statutory limits and be supported by a prima facie case established in accordance with law. Article 21 was treated as relevant where an imminent unlawful arrest is apprehended, so preventive protection may be sought against threatened deprivation of liberty. The broader challenge to quash proceedings or bar arrest was not accepted, but authorities were required to act strictly in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:53:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 94 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD AT LUC</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46613</link>
      <description>The Central Excise Act does not confer an unrestricted power on excise authorities to arrest or proceed as though conducting a police investigation under the Code of Criminal Procedure. Its inquiry mechanism is distinct from criminal investigation, and coercive action must remain within statutory limits and be supported by a prima facie case established in accordance with law. Article 21 was treated as relevant where an imminent unlawful arrest is apprehended, so preventive protection may be sought against threatened deprivation of liberty. The broader challenge to quash proceedings or bar arrest was not accepted, but authorities were required to act strictly in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>