https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778503 HC held the appeal before the Tribunal was maintainable under Section 55(2); the Tribunal rightly entertained challenge to the First Appellate Authority's part-payment direction and its summary rejection, since the order of summary rejection cannot be bifurcated from the part-payment order. The court found that orders fixing part payment, though not listed in Section 56, did not oust the right of appeal under Section 55(2) and that procedural treatment alone does not exclude substantive challenge. The reference was disposed of. en-us Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Sep 2025 08:30:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778503 HC held the appeal before the Tribunal was maintainable under Section 55(2); the Tribunal rightly entertained challenge to the First Appellate Authority's part-payment direction and its summary rejection, since the order of summary rejection cannot be bifurcated from the part-payment order. The court found that orders fixing part payment, though not listed in Section 56, did not oust the right of appeal under Section 55(2) and that procedural treatment alone does not exclude substantive challenge. The reference was disposed of. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778503