<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 994 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778505</link>
    <description>The HC held the Tribunal&#039;s order to be non-speaking and unsupported by evaluation of evidence, noted a related Tribunal order had already been set aside by the Court, set aside the impugned Tribunal order and remitted the matter to the Tribunal for fresh adjudication on merits. The Tribunal is directed to hear the parties, consider material on record and decide within three months. Appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 08:30:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 994 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778505</link>
      <description>The HC held the Tribunal&#039;s order to be non-speaking and unsupported by evaluation of evidence, noted a related Tribunal order had already been set aside by the Court, set aside the impugned Tribunal order and remitted the matter to the Tribunal for fresh adjudication on merits. The Tribunal is directed to hear the parties, consider material on record and decide within three months. Appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>