https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46610 The High Court at Calcutta records that the Tribunal proceeded ex parte after rejecting an adjournment request made in the context of a lawyers' strike, which prevented the petitioner from placing a material agreement before it. The ex parte conditional deposit order was interfered with to secure an effective opportunity of hearing, and the matter was directed to be heard afresh. The merits of the dispute were expressly left open, while costs were imposed for the inconvenience caused to the respondents and the fresh hearing was made subject to payment of those costs. en-us Tue, 18 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:40:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46610 The High Court at Calcutta records that the Tribunal proceeded ex parte after rejecting an adjournment request made in the context of a lawyers' strike, which prevented the petitioner from placing a material agreement before it. The ex parte conditional deposit order was interfered with to secure an effective opportunity of hearing, and the matter was directed to be heard afresh. The merits of the dispute were expressly left open, while costs were imposed for the inconvenience caused to the respondents and the fresh hearing was made subject to payment of those costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 18 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46610