<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 116 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46609</link>
    <description>The dismissal of the writ petition for alleged suppression of facts was set aside because the Court confined itself to the propriety of that technical ground and did not decide the underlying constitutional challenge. The matter, including the challenge to Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and connected pending petitions, was remitted to the High Court for decision on merits along with the related cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 116 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46609</link>
      <description>The dismissal of the writ petition for alleged suppression of facts was set aside because the Court confined itself to the propriety of that technical ground and did not decide the underlying constitutional challenge. The matter, including the challenge to Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and connected pending petitions, was remitted to the High Court for decision on merits along with the related cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>