<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1010 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778521</link>
    <description>ITAT MUMBAI (AT) upheld deletion of addition under s.69C relating to purchase of penny-stock scrips. The tribunal found investments recorded in books, trades executed on a recognized exchange, payments routed through banking channels, and an FIR lodged against the broker for fraudulent transactions; AO conducted no independent inquiry or proof that purchase cost lay outside books. CIT(A)&#039;s deletion was sustained and the addition was disallowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 08:30:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1010 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778521</link>
      <description>ITAT MUMBAI (AT) upheld deletion of addition under s.69C relating to purchase of penny-stock scrips. The tribunal found investments recorded in books, trades executed on a recognized exchange, payments routed through banking channels, and an FIR lodged against the broker for fraudulent transactions; AO conducted no independent inquiry or proof that purchase cost lay outside books. CIT(A)&#039;s deletion was sustained and the addition was disallowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>