<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1701 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463821</link>
    <description>ITAT held in favour of the assessee, quashing the reassessment initiation as vitiated by non-application of mind: the AO invoked non-existent statutory provisions (including references to s.147(a)/(b) that had ceased to exist) and the sanction under s.151 was mechanical and undated. The Tribunal found the reasons and the Pr. CIT&#039;s approval were procedurally defective, rendering the reopening invalid and the notice issued under s.148 unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 17:45:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1701 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463821</link>
      <description>ITAT held in favour of the assessee, quashing the reassessment initiation as vitiated by non-application of mind: the AO invoked non-existent statutory provisions (including references to s.147(a)/(b) that had ceased to exist) and the sanction under s.151 was mechanical and undated. The Tribunal found the reasons and the Pr. CIT&#039;s approval were procedurally defective, rendering the reopening invalid and the notice issued under s.148 unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>