<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1895 - GUJRAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463822</link>
    <description>HC held that approval under s.151(i) for issuance of orders under s.148A(d) and notices under s.148 was valid, but the impugned s.148 notices were issued beyond the &quot;surviving time&quot; permitted by recent SC directions and therefore were time-barred. Consequently the s.148 notices and the consequential s.148A(d) orders were quashed and set aside as invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 14:57:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1895 - GUJRAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463822</link>
      <description>HC held that approval under s.151(i) for issuance of orders under s.148A(d) and notices under s.148 was valid, but the impugned s.148 notices were issued beyond the &quot;surviving time&quot; permitted by recent SC directions and therefore were time-barred. Consequently the s.148 notices and the consequential s.148A(d) orders were quashed and set aside as invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>