<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 93 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46599</link>
    <description>The High Court of Delhi, in a judgment delivered by a Division Bench, interpreted the Central Excise Law regarding licensing requirements for companies without factories and the liability to pay excise duty for companies selling goods under their brand names. The court relied on previous decisions to support its findings and allowed the writ petition in favor of the petitioner, without costs, based on the principles established in earlier judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:13:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 93 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46599</link>
      <description>The High Court of Delhi, in a judgment delivered by a Division Bench, interpreted the Central Excise Law regarding licensing requirements for companies without factories and the liability to pay excise duty for companies selling goods under their brand names. The court relied on previous decisions to support its findings and allowed the writ petition in favor of the petitioner, without costs, based on the principles established in earlier judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>