<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 658 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463808</link>
    <description>A preliminary vacancy determination under rent control law, being a jurisdictional and interlocutory step in the allotment chain, does not become immune from challenge merely because no separate revision was filed against it. In the absence of an express statutory bar or finality clause, the aggrieved party may question the vacancy finding in a revision against the final allotment order. The Court held the contrary view incorrect and affirmed that a party may either challenge the vacancy order immediately or contest it later in the statutory challenge to allotment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 15:17:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 658 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463808</link>
      <description>A preliminary vacancy determination under rent control law, being a jurisdictional and interlocutory step in the allotment chain, does not become immune from challenge merely because no separate revision was filed against it. In the absence of an express statutory bar or finality clause, the aggrieved party may question the vacancy finding in a revision against the final allotment order. The Court held the contrary view incorrect and affirmed that a party may either challenge the vacancy order immediately or contest it later in the statutory challenge to allotment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>