<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 991 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778502</link>
    <description>HC set aside impugned common penalty orders and their summary (Form GST DRC-07) dated 06.06.2025 for lack of assessing officer&#039;s signature and omission of DIN, holding such defects render the orders invalid. Relying on precedents and CBIC guidance, the court directed the respondent to conduct fresh assessment after issuing proper notice and ensuring the order bears the officer&#039;s signature and DIN. Writ petition disposed with liberty to proceed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 13:31:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 991 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778502</link>
      <description>HC set aside impugned common penalty orders and their summary (Form GST DRC-07) dated 06.06.2025 for lack of assessing officer&#039;s signature and omission of DIN, holding such defects render the orders invalid. Relying on precedents and CBIC guidance, the court directed the respondent to conduct fresh assessment after issuing proper notice and ensuring the order bears the officer&#039;s signature and DIN. Writ petition disposed with liberty to proceed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>