<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 988 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778499</link>
    <description>GST registration cannot be cancelled for non-filing of returns unless the default has continued for the statutory six-month period on the date of the cancellation order. The court held that the relevant date for testing compliance was the date of cancellation, and since only four months&#039; returns remained unpaid then, the statutory condition under Section 29(2)(c) was not met. The cancellation order was therefore unsustainable and was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 13:30:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 988 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778499</link>
      <description>GST registration cannot be cancelled for non-filing of returns unless the default has continued for the statutory six-month period on the date of the cancellation order. The court held that the relevant date for testing compliance was the date of cancellation, and since only four months&#039; returns remained unpaid then, the statutory condition under Section 29(2)(c) was not met. The cancellation order was therefore unsustainable and was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>