<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 988 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778499</link>
    <description>HC held that cancellation of the petitioner&#039;s GST registration was without jurisdiction and not in violation of Section 29(2)(c) of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017, since only four months&#039; returns were pending on the date of the order. The impugned order dated October 17, 2023 was quashed and set aside, and the petition was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 13:30:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 988 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778499</link>
      <description>HC held that cancellation of the petitioner&#039;s GST registration was without jurisdiction and not in violation of Section 29(2)(c) of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017, since only four months&#039; returns were pending on the date of the order. The impugned order dated October 17, 2023 was quashed and set aside, and the petition was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>