<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 984 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778495</link>
    <description>HC set aside the impugned cancellation order for failure to comply with natural justice. Court held that, given the facts, it would not be appropriate to keep the petition pending or force the petitioner to pursue an alternative remedy at this stage. The petitioner is permitted to file a reply to the show-cause notice within four weeks; thereafter a fresh decision must be rendered after affording a personal hearing, preferably within three months. Petition disposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 13:29:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 984 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778495</link>
      <description>HC set aside the impugned cancellation order for failure to comply with natural justice. Court held that, given the facts, it would not be appropriate to keep the petition pending or force the petitioner to pursue an alternative remedy at this stage. The petitioner is permitted to file a reply to the show-cause notice within four weeks; thereafter a fresh decision must be rendered after affording a personal hearing, preferably within three months. Petition disposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>