<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 984 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778495</link>
    <description>Where GST registration had been cancelled and not revived, the High Court held that the assessee was not bound to monitor the GST portal for e-notices for that period. As the revenue failed to prove physical or offline service of the show cause notice before passing the adjudication order, the court found a denial of a meaningful opportunity to respond and a breach of natural justice. The adjudication order was set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration after allowing a reply and personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 13:29:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 984 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778495</link>
      <description>Where GST registration had been cancelled and not revived, the High Court held that the assessee was not bound to monitor the GST portal for e-notices for that period. As the revenue failed to prove physical or offline service of the show cause notice before passing the adjudication order, the court found a denial of a meaningful opportunity to respond and a breach of natural justice. The adjudication order was set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration after allowing a reply and personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>