<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 978 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778489</link>
    <description>ITAT (Chandigarh) allowed the appeal, holding that income surrendered during a survey should be assessed under regular provisions rather than under Sections 69A/69C or 115BBE. The tribunal found no evidence of measured or unexplained investments; the surrendered amount reflected business income voluntarily declared to avoid litigation and the Revenue failed to disprove the stated source. The AO was directed to assess the sum under normal provisions and not treat it as unexplained cash subject to penal consequences.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 13:27:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 978 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778489</link>
      <description>ITAT (Chandigarh) allowed the appeal, holding that income surrendered during a survey should be assessed under regular provisions rather than under Sections 69A/69C or 115BBE. The tribunal found no evidence of measured or unexplained investments; the surrendered amount reflected business income voluntarily declared to avoid litigation and the Revenue failed to disprove the stated source. The AO was directed to assess the sum under normal provisions and not treat it as unexplained cash subject to penal consequences.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>