<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1566 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463806</link>
    <description>SC refused to interfere with the impugned order under the limited jurisdiction of Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, recording the petitioner&#039;s acceptance of termination of the joint development agreement. The Court noted that the governing principle on the timing of approval of a resolution plan is settled and dismissed the special leave petition without commenting on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 10:46:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1566 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463806</link>
      <description>SC refused to interfere with the impugned order under the limited jurisdiction of Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, recording the petitioner&#039;s acceptance of termination of the joint development agreement. The Court noted that the governing principle on the timing of approval of a resolution plan is settled and dismissed the special leave petition without commenting on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>