https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463806 Under the limited jurisdiction in an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the SC declined to interfere with the impugned order. The petitioner's senior counsel stated that the petitioner ed termination of the Joint Development Agreement and acknowledged that the law on approval of a resolution plan stands settled by the SC in Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd. v. Union of India. The special leave petition was dismissed without any comments on the merits. en-us Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Sep 2025 10:46:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463806 Under the limited jurisdiction in an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the SC declined to interfere with the impugned order. The petitioner's senior counsel stated that the petitioner ed termination of the Joint Development Agreement and acknowledged that the law on approval of a resolution plan stands settled by the SC in Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd. v. Union of India. The special leave petition was dismissed without any comments on the merits. Case-Laws IBC Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463806