<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 115 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46590</link>
    <description>SC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s finding that the goods were classifiable under Heading 85.47 but held that invoking the first proviso to s.11A(1) was unjustified since there was no suppression or wilful misstatement. The appeals were allowed, the Tribunal&#039;s orders were modified accordingly, and the penalty imposed was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2025 17:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 115 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46590</link>
      <description>SC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s finding that the goods were classifiable under Heading 85.47 but held that invoking the first proviso to s.11A(1) was unjustified since there was no suppression or wilful misstatement. The appeals were allowed, the Tribunal&#039;s orders were modified accordingly, and the penalty imposed was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>