<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 123 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46589</link>
    <description>SC held that cold drawing a wire rod into a thinner gauge does not amount to manufacture and therefore does not render the resultant wire excisable. The court agreed with the Tribunal that the initial rod and final wire remain essentially the same product; reduction in gauge and improved finish do not create a new marketable article. Distinct tariff entries alone do not establish excisability. Decision: against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2025 14:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 123 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46589</link>
      <description>SC held that cold drawing a wire rod into a thinner gauge does not amount to manufacture and therefore does not render the resultant wire excisable. The court agreed with the Tribunal that the initial rod and final wire remain essentially the same product; reduction in gauge and improved finish do not create a new marketable article. Distinct tariff entries alone do not establish excisability. Decision: against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>