<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 125 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46587</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking permission to re-export imported goods after the warehousing period expired, stating that Section 72(b) of the Customs Act applies in such cases, necessitating payment of duties and penalties. The court clarified that Section 69 only applies during the valid warehousing period under Section 61. Therefore, the petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:36:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 125 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46587</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking permission to re-export imported goods after the warehousing period expired, stating that Section 72(b) of the Customs Act applies in such cases, necessitating payment of duties and penalties. The court clarified that Section 69 only applies during the valid warehousing period under Section 61. Therefore, the petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>