https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46586 A restriction on foreign travel and retention of a passport should not continue where the facts show no real likelihood of absconding or interference with evidence, and the travel is supported by bona fide business needs. The petitioner had previously travelled abroad and returned, maintained business interests in India, and sought travel for legitimate business purposes. On that basis, the HC held that continued withholding of the passport and refusal of travel permission were unwarranted, and permitted travel to Turkey and Egypt for one month subject to the bank guarantee and surety directed by the Court. en-us Thu, 12 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:34:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46586 A restriction on foreign travel and retention of a passport should not continue where the facts show no real likelihood of absconding or interference with evidence, and the travel is supported by bona fide business needs. The petitioner had previously travelled abroad and returned, maintained business interests in India, and sought travel for legitimate business purposes. On that basis, the HC held that continued withholding of the passport and refusal of travel permission were unwarranted, and permitted travel to Turkey and Egypt for one month subject to the bank guarantee and surety directed by the Court. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 12 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46586