<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 976 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778487</link>
    <description>HC held the impugned ex parte appellate order unlawful for violating natural justice by being passed on a date when the petitioner was not put on notice. Relying on its prior rulings, the Court quashed the impugned order and remanded the matter to the first appellate authority for fresh decision after affording personal hearing to the petitioner, to be completed expeditiously, preferably within three months of production of a certified copy. Petition partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 10:04:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 976 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778487</link>
      <description>HC held the impugned ex parte appellate order unlawful for violating natural justice by being passed on a date when the petitioner was not put on notice. Relying on its prior rulings, the Court quashed the impugned order and remanded the matter to the first appellate authority for fresh decision after affording personal hearing to the petitioner, to be completed expeditiously, preferably within three months of production of a certified copy. Petition partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>