<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1715 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463804</link>
    <description>ITAT held that unserved or unresponsive confirmations cannot alone sustain the assessee&#039;s books; confirmations without corroboration shift the burden to the assessee to prove genuineness. The assessee had declared income at 0.77% of turnover but failed to establish transactions in many cases. The Tribunal found no infirmity in CIT(A)&#039;s order, which accepted the alternate contention only after considering facts and the assessee&#039;s inability to prove genuineness, and accordingly dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 14:09:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1715 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463804</link>
      <description>ITAT held that unserved or unresponsive confirmations cannot alone sustain the assessee&#039;s books; confirmations without corroboration shift the burden to the assessee to prove genuineness. The assessee had declared income at 0.77% of turnover but failed to establish transactions in many cases. The Tribunal found no infirmity in CIT(A)&#039;s order, which accepted the alternate contention only after considering facts and the assessee&#039;s inability to prove genuineness, and accordingly dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>