https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778481 HC refused interim protection and declined to grant interim orders under Section 74 of the GST Act, finding suppression of facts to evade tax. The court directed that the Rs. 5,50,62,464 already paid by the petitioners be treated as a deposit and shall abide by final orders in the writ petition. Noting that over 50% of the demand has been recovered and that an appellate deposit would be 10% of disputed tax, the court held the revenue's interest is sufficiently safeguarded. Matter listed for hearing on 28 November 2025. en-us Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Sep 2025 08:33:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778481 HC refused interim protection and declined to grant interim orders under Section 74 of the GST Act, finding suppression of facts to evade tax. The court directed that the Rs. 5,50,62,464 already paid by the petitioners be treated as a deposit and shall abide by final orders in the writ petition. Noting that over 50% of the demand has been recovered and that an appellate deposit would be 10% of disputed tax, the court held the revenue's interest is sufficiently safeguarded. Matter listed for hearing on 28 November 2025. Case-Laws GST Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778481