<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 966 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778477</link>
    <description>The SC refused to interfere with the HC&#039;s decision allowing condonation of delay and holding that the appellant could not be non-suited on limitation grounds in claims for refund of excess customs duty where reassessed bills of entry were not produced; the HC&#039;s ruling that the appeals were not time-barred was upheld and the special leave petitions were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 08:33:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 966 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778477</link>
      <description>The SC refused to interfere with the HC&#039;s decision allowing condonation of delay and holding that the appellant could not be non-suited on limitation grounds in claims for refund of excess customs duty where reassessed bills of entry were not produced; the HC&#039;s ruling that the appeals were not time-barred was upheld and the special leave petitions were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>