<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1629 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463801</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the review petition challenging the HC&#039;s finding that proceedings under Section 27 of the VAT Act and notices in Form IV and V under the RR Act, attaching property for alleged tax arrears for 2009-10 and 2010-11, were unsustainable. The court held no case for review of its order dated 20.03.2023 was made out and accordingly refused relief, leaving the High Court&#039;s determination intact and denying the petitioner&#039;s request to reopen the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 08:32:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1629 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463801</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the review petition challenging the HC&#039;s finding that proceedings under Section 27 of the VAT Act and notices in Form IV and V under the RR Act, attaching property for alleged tax arrears for 2009-10 and 2010-11, were unsustainable. The court held no case for review of its order dated 20.03.2023 was made out and accordingly refused relief, leaving the High Court&#039;s determination intact and denying the petitioner&#039;s request to reopen the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>