https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778472 A labour-law challenge to a layoff notice issued during CIRP was treated as outside the adjudicating authority's jurisdiction, because the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code's overriding effect applied and the dispute did not become an industrial dispute for insolvency adjudication. The workmen's claim for post-layoff wages and dues also failed: wages during CIRP are payable only where the corporate debtor is run as a going concern and the workmen actually work during that period. On the facts found, no such post-layoff work was performed, and the approved resolution plan remained binding on stakeholders. en-us Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Sep 2025 08:32:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778472 A labour-law challenge to a layoff notice issued during CIRP was treated as outside the adjudicating authority's jurisdiction, because the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code's overriding effect applied and the dispute did not become an industrial dispute for insolvency adjudication. The workmen's claim for post-layoff wages and dues also failed: wages during CIRP are payable only where the corporate debtor is run as a going concern and the workmen actually work during that period. On the facts found, no such post-layoff work was performed, and the approved resolution plan remained binding on stakeholders. Case-Laws IBC Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778472