<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 110 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46581</link>
    <description>Empty drums or containers in which inputs are received cannot be treated as waste arising from the manufacturing process for Modvat purposes. As there was no specific charging provision levying duty on such containers, the Tribunal held that Modvat credit was not required to be reversed and duty could not be demanded on their clearance from the factory; the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2025 12:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 110 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46581</link>
      <description>Empty drums or containers in which inputs are received cannot be treated as waste arising from the manufacturing process for Modvat purposes. As there was no specific charging provision levying duty on such containers, the Tribunal held that Modvat credit was not required to be reversed and duty could not be demanded on their clearance from the factory; the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>