https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778442 HC set aside the Tribunal's order for lack of application of mind, noting the Adjudicating Authority's order was reasoned and based on evidence and documents. The Tribunal failed to consider the materials or frame and decide points with reasons, instead dismissing the Department's clandestine removal charge for lack of corroboration. The HC answered substantial questions of law in favor of the adjudicating party, allowed the appeal by remand, and directed the Tribunal to rehear and decide the appeal on merits within three months. en-us Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Sep 2025 08:31:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778442 HC set aside the Tribunal's order for lack of application of mind, noting the Adjudicating Authority's order was reasoned and based on evidence and documents. The Tribunal failed to consider the materials or frame and decide points with reasons, instead dismissing the Department's clandestine removal charge for lack of corroboration. The HC answered substantial questions of law in favor of the adjudicating party, allowed the appeal by remand, and directed the Tribunal to rehear and decide the appeal on merits within three months. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778442