https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778445 CESTAT held the appeal partly allowed. The appellant's acknowledgment of liability for late fee meant no dispute on that demand; however, interest under Section 75 was confirmed for two invoices-one six-day delay and one two-day delay-making the interest demand of Rs. 2,57,814 sustainable for those periods. Payments for several other invoices were found to result from typographical errors in ST-3 returns, so interest confirmed for those invoices was quashed. Overall, interest was sustained only for the admitted delayed payments and set aside for the rest. en-us Mon, 15 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Sep 2025 08:31:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778445 CESTAT held the appeal partly allowed. The appellant's acknowledgment of liability for late fee meant no dispute on that demand; however, interest under Section 75 was confirmed for two invoices-one six-day delay and one two-day delay-making the interest demand of Rs. 2,57,814 sustainable for those periods. Payments for several other invoices were found to result from typographical errors in ST-3 returns, so interest confirmed for those invoices was quashed. Overall, interest was sustained only for the admitted delayed payments and set aside for the rest. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 15 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778445