https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778449 ITAT, Surat (AT) dismissed the assessee's appeal and sustained an addition under s.69A where the assessee failed to explain the nature and source of cash deposits in bank accounts. The tribunal applied the principle that adjudicative bodies may dismiss matters in default when a party does not prosecute or pursue its appeal, and found no obligation to keep the matter pending on behalf of the appellant. The addition was therefore upheld. en-us Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Sep 2025 08:31:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778449 ITAT, Surat (AT) dismissed the assessee's appeal and sustained an addition under s.69A where the assessee failed to explain the nature and source of cash deposits in bank accounts. The tribunal applied the principle that adjudicative bodies may dismiss matters in default when a party does not prosecute or pursue its appeal, and found no obligation to keep the matter pending on behalf of the appellant. The addition was therefore upheld. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778449