https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46574 The court dismissed the petitioner's claim for relief from warehousing charges, holding that the Customs Department was not liable for the charges. The court found no evidence of mala fide intentions by the Revenue Authorities and emphasized the protection under Section 155 of the Customs Act for actions done in good faith. Despite the prolonged legal battle and alleged misconduct, the court ruled that delays in clearance did not absolve the petitioner of demurrage charges, citing legal precedents to support its decision. en-us Mon, 02 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:37:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46574 The court dismissed the petitioner's claim for relief from warehousing charges, holding that the Customs Department was not liable for the charges. The court found no evidence of mala fide intentions by the Revenue Authorities and emphasized the protection under Section 155 of the Customs Act for actions done in good faith. Despite the prolonged legal battle and alleged misconduct, the court ruled that delays in clearance did not absolve the petitioner of demurrage charges, citing legal precedents to support its decision. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 02 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46574