<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1628 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463792</link>
    <description>Delay condonation was refused where the only explanation for late filing was pursuit of a section 154 remedy, because that petition had been disposed of much earlier and no explanation covered the long gap before the appeal was filed. The reliance on exclusion of the pandemic period did not cure the remaining unexplained delay. The refusal to condone the delay was therefore upheld and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 18:59:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=850916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1628 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463792</link>
      <description>Delay condonation was refused where the only explanation for late filing was pursuit of a section 154 remedy, because that petition had been disposed of much earlier and no explanation covered the long gap before the appeal was filed. The reliance on exclusion of the pandemic period did not cure the remaining unexplained delay. The refusal to condone the delay was therefore upheld and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>