<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1588 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463794</link>
    <description>Reopening under the Income-tax Act based on materially similar recorded reasons was found unsustainable where those reasons had already been held invalid in a connected matter decided the same day. The Bombay HC applied the earlier view to the present petitions and quashed the Section 148 notices, the consequential assessment order, and all related orders. As the reassessment proceedings rested on the impugned reopening, they were invalidated in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 17:30:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=850914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1588 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463794</link>
      <description>Reopening under the Income-tax Act based on materially similar recorded reasons was found unsustainable where those reasons had already been held invalid in a connected matter decided the same day. The Bombay HC applied the earlier view to the present petitions and quashed the Section 148 notices, the consequential assessment order, and all related orders. As the reassessment proceedings rested on the impugned reopening, they were invalidated in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>