<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 77 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46570</link>
    <description>Penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was not finally determined, as the Supreme Court left open whether the penalty had to equal the duty amount. No opinion was expressed on the merits of that question. The matter was disposed of with a direction that the assessee&#039;s pending appeal before the Tribunal be decided on its merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:28:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 77 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46570</link>
      <description>Penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was not finally determined, as the Supreme Court left open whether the penalty had to equal the duty amount. No opinion was expressed on the merits of that question. The matter was disposed of with a direction that the assessee&#039;s pending appeal before the Tribunal be decided on its merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>