<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 121 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46569</link>
    <description>Customs certificates produced after substantial delay were treated with doubt, but the petitioner was still entitled to a reasonable opportunity to place additional supporting records before the adjudicating authority. On that basis, the customs orders were set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication, with liberty to the petitioner to produce relevant material in support of its claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:27:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 121 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46569</link>
      <description>Customs certificates produced after substantial delay were treated with doubt, but the petitioner was still entitled to a reasonable opportunity to place additional supporting records before the adjudicating authority. On that basis, the customs orders were set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication, with liberty to the petitioner to produce relevant material in support of its claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>