<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 92 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46568</link>
    <description>The court quashed the criminal proceedings against one petitioner, Trilok Nath Mittal, as he was found not involved in the customs duty evasion. However, the petition of the other petitioner, Pawan Kumar Gupta, was rejected, indicating the need for further evidence in his case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:23:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 92 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46568</link>
      <description>The court quashed the criminal proceedings against one petitioner, Trilok Nath Mittal, as he was found not involved in the customs duty evasion. However, the petition of the other petitioner, Pawan Kumar Gupta, was rejected, indicating the need for further evidence in his case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>