<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 1246 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463778</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi upheld the AO&#039;s reference to the TPO as valid. RPM was rejected and TNMM affirmed as the most appropriate method. Use of contemporaneous/current-year comparables was sustained; the TPO/DRP&#039;s comparable selection and search methodology were upheld except that the Tribunal remanded the turnover-filter issue to the DRP/AO for fresh consideration with opportunity to be heard. The amended proviso to s.92C(2) (+/-5%) was held applicable but did not yield relief here. Initiation of penalty proceedings was dismissed as non-appealable; interest under ss.234B/234D was sustained. Appeal otherwise dismissed/partly allowed for remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 12:38:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=850817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 1246 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463778</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi upheld the AO&#039;s reference to the TPO as valid. RPM was rejected and TNMM affirmed as the most appropriate method. Use of contemporaneous/current-year comparables was sustained; the TPO/DRP&#039;s comparable selection and search methodology were upheld except that the Tribunal remanded the turnover-filter issue to the DRP/AO for fresh consideration with opportunity to be heard. The amended proviso to s.92C(2) (+/-5%) was held applicable but did not yield relief here. Initiation of penalty proceedings was dismissed as non-appealable; interest under ss.234B/234D was sustained. Appeal otherwise dismissed/partly allowed for remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>