<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 114 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46558</link>
    <description>Sand coated with resin was examined for duty liability in light of Notification No. 217/86-C.E., which specifically covered sand used in the manufacture of castings when consumed captively. On that footing, the exemption was treated as applicable to captive consumption, and the Tribunal&#039;s view was found correct with no infirmity in the impugned order. The result was that no duty was payable on such captive use of sand in casting manufacture, and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:04:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 114 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46558</link>
      <description>Sand coated with resin was examined for duty liability in light of Notification No. 217/86-C.E., which specifically covered sand used in the manufacture of castings when consumed captively. On that footing, the exemption was treated as applicable to captive consumption, and the Tribunal&#039;s view was found correct with no infirmity in the impugned order. The result was that no duty was payable on such captive use of sand in casting manufacture, and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>