<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1525 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463775</link>
    <description>ITAT MUMBAI held that the addition to book profit under s.115JB for re-characterising depreciation as an &quot;impairment&quot; was incorrect and upheld the CIT(A) order deleting the addition. The assets had been disposed of as scrap and no provision for diminution existed; the loss was a realized difference between opening WDV and scrap proceeds, charged to P&amp;L. AS-10 governs disposal treatment, so the amount is not a provision. Decision against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 08:45:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=850772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1525 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463775</link>
      <description>ITAT MUMBAI held that the addition to book profit under s.115JB for re-characterising depreciation as an &quot;impairment&quot; was incorrect and upheld the CIT(A) order deleting the addition. The assets had been disposed of as scrap and no provision for diminution existed; the loss was a realized difference between opening WDV and scrap proceeds, charged to P&amp;L. AS-10 governs disposal treatment, so the amount is not a provision. Decision against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>