https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92548 The SC affirmed the NCLAT's conclusion that the appellants were speculative investors and upheld the orders setting aside admission of the Section 7 IBC applications, thereby denying initiation of CIRP at their instance. The Court further held the Ordinance/Amendment Act introducing threshold requirements for allottee-initiated Section 7 petitions is applicable to the facts and, to that extent, set aside the first impugned order. The appellants remain at liberty to pursue alternative remedies before appropriate fora; any such proceedings will not be barred by limitation. The appeals are disposed of accordingly. en-us Tue, 16 Sep 2025 09:02:41 +0530 Tue, 16 Sep 2025 09:02:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92548 The SC affirmed the NCLAT's conclusion that the appellants were speculative investors and upheld the orders setting aside admission of the Section 7 IBC applications, thereby denying initiation of CIRP at their instance. The Court further held the Ordinance/Amendment Act introducing threshold requirements for allottee-initiated Section 7 petitions is applicable to the facts and, to that extent, set aside the first impugned order. The appellants remain at liberty to pursue alternative remedies before appropriate fora; any such proceedings will not be barred by limitation. The appeals are disposed of accordingly. Highlights IBC Tue, 16 Sep 2025 09:02:41 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92548